At 19:00 on November 29, 2018, the administrative lecture hall was lively. The 2017 School of Management Debate Competition hosted by the School of Management Counselors Workshop is held here. School of Management Counselors Workshop All instructors serve as judges.
A total of 3 teams from the 17 undergraduate level of the School of Management participated in this competition. Each team is full of confidence and fighting spirit. In the first match, the social hot topic "Chongqing Wanzhou Bus Incident" was ignited. The team directed by Huang Ping's teacher, Zhi United's station, has the view that "building public transport civilization depends on personal literacy" against the team directed by Meng Jia's teacher. The commentator's good argument team station has the opposite view of "building public transport civilization depends on social system"; In the second game, the two sides debated the "Anhui Water Cattle Slaughtering Incident." Zhi United once again made efforts and believed that "honesty in economic activities depends on self-discipline." The team directed by Qin Li's teacher, the Wanzhou team, insists on "relying on other laws in good faith in economic activities"; In the third debate, the two sides debated the hot event that "Suzhou Marathon affected Chinese player Heyinli to win the championship due to volunteers handing over the national flag." The Wanjun team supports the idea that the expression of patriotic feelings is more important, and the commentator's good defense team supports the anti-party view that the expression of patriotic feelings is more important. In the course of the competition, you argue that you have been quoted and quoted, and you have combined theory and reality to demonstrate that the two sides have not given up to each other, and you have dedicated a well-grounded and wonderful debate for everyone.
In the three debates in this field, the three teams each passed the fierce battle of five links: argument, offensive and defensive stage, summary, free debate, and summation. They competed with the era style of independent and rational thinking of contemporary college students. In the end, the "speech team" won the championship of this debate. After the comprehensive voting of the judges and teachers, three "best defenders" were selected: Jiang Shifang, Tian Linlin, and Fang Hao.
he success of this event has enriched students 'extra-curricular cultural life, provided students with a platform for exchange, improved the comprehensive quality of college students, and strengthened their thinking on integrity. It is an important measure to further promote the continuous and healthy development of various types of academic construction and comprehensive quality improvement in our hospital.
China · Chongqing · South hot spring
TEL:023-642846626 023-62846636
Copyright Chongqing Institute of Engineering